Naval Law Review
Published by the Naval Justice School (NJS), the Naval Law Review encourages frank discussion of relevant legislative, administrative and judicial developments in military and related fields of law. Views expressed in published articles must be considered solely those of individual authors and do not purport to voice the views of NJS, the Judge Advocate General, the Department of the Navy, or any other Agency or Department of the United States. The Naval Law Review is published from appropriated funds by the authority of the Judge Advocate General, in accordance with Navy Publications and Printing Regulations P-35.
The latest issue of the Naval Law Review is available below. For access to previous editions, please contact the Naval Justice School.
- Military Sentencing Parameters and Criteria Offenses: A First Step to Reducing “Noise” in Court-Martial Sentencing
- Hardy Tars and Tall Marines: Service Member Armed Guards in the Strait of Hormuz
- Rational Choice Realism: The Equilibrium of Armed Conflict
- Congressional Authority Over Armed Conflict and Its Untapped Power Under Article IV
- “Any Sexual Misconduct”: The Application of MRE 412 To Art. 117a
- Beyond Warships: Integrating Other Vessels Into Naval Operations
- Hemp to Hellfires: Environmental Lawfare as an Asset for National Security
- One China to Rule Them All: The P.R.C.’s Distortion of the One China Principle